quote:
Several of you asked about my personal favorites (of those written by me). That's probably the hardest of all questions for me, or any author to answer, because it's a little like asking us to chose our favorite child.
(Clay, if you're reading this, don't you dare start in on this subject. )
I think the best way to answer is to do it off the top of my head, based on my
feelings at this moment. Of my contemporaries, I think PARADISE is my favorite and Matt Farrell my favorite
hero. Now, before you react to that, I need to explain that my reasons aren't those of a reader, they're those
of a writer.
In the first place, PARADISE was a break-out book for me--It was my first "big" contemporary (the other two
had been Harlequins written about 12 years before. )
Now, some of you may find this hard to believe but there's a whole group
of historical romance fans who truly resent it when I write a contemporary, instead of an historical. Fortunately, there's a vastly larger group love both
contemporaries and historicals, but I wasn't completely certain of that when I decided to write PARADISE.
Furthermore, besides being my first hardcover release, PARAISE was also going to be my first "mainstream romance" (don't even try to ask me to
define that distinction. It's a publishing thing that kind of defies easy description.)
Given all that, I was truly uneasy (read that petrified) about what I was trying to do and if I could do it well.
And then along came Matt Farrell. Within the first few chapters, he struggled out of my apprehensive imagination, moved me gently out of his
way, and by his very vivid presence, he sort of took over. He didn't need me to re-shape him, or smooth out his
edges. I didn't have to continually re-write him and ponder and agonize over
whether or not such a character might logically--and likeably--do and say
certain things.
He was just so…alive. And, I thought, pretty wonderful.
In an interesting aside, I should add that to my constant surprise, the men
who read my books (or are forced to read them by their wives) invariably ending up not only liking PARADISE best, but identifying themselves very proudly with Matt Farrell.
For many of those same reasons, I also loved Meredith as a heroine. I liked what she stood for--despite her beauty and wealth and social position, she had
heart, she had kindness, she had empathy. She represented all the good things women can be. True, she was a little prim, but she was prim in a
lovely, comic, self-conscious way.
The other reason I'm inclined to chose PARADISE (today, not necessarily next week, you understand), is that despite
all my misgivings, PARADISE hit the best-seller lists like a rocket when it was released, and it gained for our entire genre a whole new group of readers who'd been eschewing romance novels their whole life and who,
furthermore, only bought hardcovers. (Prior to PARADISE, only a few romance
authors had ever been released in hardcover. In fact, I think the only
ones were Kathleen Woodiwiss, Jude Deveraux, and LaVyrle Spencer. Of those, Jude had been released about a year before me and for the first time. As I recall, LaVyrle's hardcover preceeded mine by only a few months. What I'm getting at there is that the
whole notion was new and seemed awfully risky.
This message is so long, I think I'll post it now and address the other part of the question separately.
SimonSays.com
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
